The majority of young people are environmentally conscious and actively care for the environment. They are worried about issues such as climate change, earth & sea pollution and animal extinction, and feel strongly that there is a sense of urgency to repair the planet.
However, a number of young people who are supporters of preventing climate change don’t think enough of the population care about these issues, and that Governments and big businesses/brands are not implementing policies or making changes that are radical enough. There is a shared sentiment that large corporations are wasteful, burning fossils fuels at an alarming rate and are not using renewable energy sources enough.
Young people are also concerned about animal welfare, whether that be through the slaughtering of animals for food, to earth and water pollution that is destroying eco-systems.
I think it is obvious that weather patterns have become far more extreme compared to the previous 10 years for example. There are also a lot of threats to animals with even Giraffe’s now being endangered. It worries me about how the planet could be in another 10 or 20 years.” – Female, 24, Pop:Socials, Alternative
Climate change. The planet is warming at an alarm rate and the effects are now physically apparent across the world. The very fact that we can notice these differences and their impact on our daily lives suggests ignoring them is incredibly problematic.” – Male, 19
I don’t think there’s enough action happening by the people who can actually do something, it’s great that the topic has become mainstream now, thanks to protestors and scientists who have raised their voices, but we need action to clean the planet.” – Female, 19, Pop:Socials, Alternative
A common thread throughout is that young people think the environment has become a bigger topic of conversation, and is being campaigned about more, both of which have led to greater levels of awareness.
Young people feel they’re “doing their bit”, but note that their actions are limited to one to two of the following: recycling, using compost bins, using bio-degradable products (e.g. paper straws), using re-usable products (e.g. water bottles/coffee cups and shopping bags), reducing electricity/water use and picking up litter. There is an appetite amongst young people to be educated on what else they can be doing to help care for the environment and minimize their carbon footprint.
A few young people said they don’t think about the environment that much, should be doing more and feel quite selfish for not caring more deeply about their planet.
Less common but other notable ways in which some young people care for the environment is through reducing (or stopping altogether) meat and/or dairy consumption, taking public transport/walking, buying sustainable clothing e.g. charity/vintage shops, donating clothes and refraining from buying fast fashion brands e.g. Primark.
There were high levels of awareness amongst young people for brands being more environmentally conscious. Of these brands, the ones that stood out most were focused on making a significant public commitment to reduce their environmental impact – sometimes in a way that young people perceived were not necessarily profitable for the brand.
An overwhelming sentiment emerged from the responses – if young people feel as though brands are prioritising caring for the environment, it resonates strongly with them. A sense of commitment from the brand must clear and definable, proving that they are not ‘green-washing’ and merely jumping on the bandwagon. Young people are not easily fooled, and will immediately sniff it out if a brand is not being authentic.
What is clear from these responses is that it is really important to young people that brands are actively caring for the environment – they have a genuine interest in the topic, and keenly seek out information about brands and their environmental policies. It wouldn’t be an exaggeration to say that a significant proportion of the young people we spoke to are not only knowledgeable and well-informed, but they are passionate about the topic.
I feel very strongly about sustainable business as I care about the future of the kids I will raise and the environment. We need to encourage big business to reduce their carbon footprint, and engage in sustainable practices in an authentic and genuine way – F, 21
Lush was clearly the stand-out brand when we prompted 16-24 year olds to give examples of big businesses/brands that are actively caring for the environment. It was described as a brand that is synonymous with being environmentally friendly and ensuring their products are ethically sourced. This is perceived to be unique in an industry that has traditionally had a bad ethical reputation, particularly in relation to animal testing.
This group attributed their high awareness of Lush’s involvement in caring for the environment through their clear brand identity and prevalent marketing messages, which have clearly cut through strongly with this age group.
Lush is quite a well-known environmentally friendly brand. All their products are ethically sourced and they do a lot of awareness work for environmental causes and concerns. I think this is really important because it not only provides good products that aren’t damaging, but informs a large amount of people about environmental issues – F,17
H&M’s commitments to a more sustainable fashion future were widely praised
It was widely known amongst the young people that we spoke to that H&M has made a public commitment to a more sustainable fashion future – notably by only using renewable sources of electricity and sustainability sourced materials for their collections. There was also an awareness of the H&M clothes recycling scheme, which young people recognise as being an important way of combating fast fashion.
A key highlight of H&M is their commitment to use fully renewable electricity. In 2016, almost 96% of the total electricity used by the company in its own operations came from renewable sources. Their future goals and actions are now extremely important, as they try to help the environment in different aspects – F, 22, Urban, Short:Snaps
Of the big businesses/brands that young people are aware of actively caring for the environment, the majority were mentioned for their use of recyclable or reusable materials in their products and/or packaging. This was particularly prevalent amongst fashion or FMCG brands. Starbucks was frequently mentioned as an example due to their initiative selling reusable cups and offering a 10% discount for people who bring their own cups.
It was widely acknowledged by our respondents that it’s increasingly important brands use their platform to encourage consumers to act more sustainably. There was also a sense that even little changes are important as they have a big impact – young people praise brands that are at least doing something.
Starbucks – it is important they make a bold statement about their actions, showing an ‘if we can do it’ then ‘you can do it’ attitude – M, 20, Urban, Short:Snaps”
Supermarket brands were frequently mentioned as making significant environmental contributions in this space – which is particularly important given their propensity to be wasteful and overuse plastic packaging.
The palm oil industry is currently a silent destroyer of our rainforests, which I’m sure a lot of people, including myself, were not aware of until recently. I think what Iceland are proposing is extremely necessary and makes me want to support them by buying their products. There is still more to be done though – F, 20, Aspirant, VOD:Bingers
Car brands were most frequently mentioned as operating in this space, primarily for their investment in electric cars to help reduce the environmental impacts of motor vehicles. Mentioned examples include BMW, Ford and Chevrolet, amongst others.
One example that a few respondents commented on is the partnership between Soriana, Mexico’s second-largest supermarket chain, and GemEx, a renewable energy company in Mexico, who are working together to develop two wind parks in the state of Tamaulipas, Mexico. The supermarket chain has plans to use the electricity from wind farms to power its stores. The company aims to source 100% of its electricity needs from renewables. Each wind farm will be made up of 15 wind turbines – the total project investment is estimated at US$150 million each.
This is a very good project to save energy, and particularly important as some areas of Mexico suffer difficulties with access to electricity. It is great to create awareness of this issue – M, 19, Mainstream, Pop:Socials
Another example a couple of respondents were aware of was Bimbo Bakery’s recent investment. As one of the largest bakeries in the world, Bimbo made an investment of 20 million pesos into building an Ecological Shopping Centre in Mexico (inaugurated in 2013). This centre has become the new sustainable distribution model in the company, and uses only renewable energy sources to power the vehicle operations.
This centre also receives vehicles whose life cycle is about to end, these are converted into new electric cars by the bakery engineers. Which is interesting and important, because they reuse something that someone else is going to throw away, I think it’s important for this reason, it would be less crap to put it that way. – F, 18, Urban, Short:Snaps
Ikea supports sustainable design, natural resources and they take on initiatives such as tree planting to reduce their carbon footprint – F, 19, Mainstream, Short:Snaps
Sofology – instead of offering Black Friday discounts, they are promising to plant a tree for every sale that is made over this period. I think their actions are hugely important. Not only is it making a significant change considering the number of sales they make, but it is promoting a sustainable mindset and bringing it to people’s attention which could have a huge snowball effect.
EasyJet was mentioned a few times by respondents as it is set to become the first major airline to operate zero carbon flights across the entire network by offsetting it’s jet fuel emissions through projects that include planting of trees, protection against deforestation, production of renewable energies, or working with local communities to reduce emissions.
I think this is really important as air travel is an enormous cause of pollution and increased carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, and reducing this is extremely important – F, 21
A few brands were mentioned for their commitment to giving back to the environment, namely Patagonia – a outdoor clothing company which has become synonymous with it’s sustainable approach to business. Patagonia operates a business model that is committed to donating a percentage of profits towards conservation and creating ethically-minded clothes that minimise waste products.
Patagonia – donating profits towards conservation and creating ethical clothes by considering waste, source of materials recycling etc. I think it’s super important because fast fashion is terrible for the environment – M, 20, Urban, VOD:Bingers
Many respondents spoke about how important it was for big businesses/brands to use their position to not only create awareness for the climate crisis, but to lead the way by example and encourage the public to act in more environmentally friendly ways. They agree that this is particularly important for big global brands who have a responsibility to their consumers across the world and the global environment in which they operate.
“As consumers we can only buy what is available and the big businesses need to take responsibility for what they sell so we can all make better choices.” – F, 23, Mainstream, VOD:Socials
“Big businesses really are the only ones who have the power to make really and impactful change. To be honest they are the main reason we’re all in this mess” – M, 22, Leading Edge, VOD:Socials
Young people point to two industries where brands need to focus on being more environmentally conscious due to their wasteful nature – fashion and beauty.
“Clothes are currently very under-looked as a source of pollution in the environment. Adidas has made a trainer that is 100% recyclable, which is great because they are one of the largest shoe/sportswear companies in the world.” – F, 22, Leading Edge, Short:Snaps
“I think sustainability in big business is very important, especially those that product a lot of waste such as the beauty products market.” – F, 19, Alternative, Pop:Socials
They feel strongly that brands need to use their influence to have a positive impact, set an example for the rest of their industry and make a real difference
Today, businesses and brands do have a massive influence on society, so if these companies can do their part to help the environment, then it would encourage others to be more eco-friendly as well as make it easier. – F, 18, Alternative, Pop:Socials
McDonald’s changing their plastic straws and plastic tubs into paper is important because you think of the millions of people around the world everyday who eat McDonald’s, so it will make a bit difference – F, 22, Leading Edge, Short:Snaps
Sky – Support ocean rescue, via employees who volunteer towards this and also through their office environment e.g. plastic free no water bottles and a café made from recycled plastics. Their actions are important because they are a large company who as such can have a big impact and encourage their customers, employees and other businesses to follow suit.
In many cases, a perception that brands are committed to caring for the environment translates into an increased propensity to purchase from these brands.
I feel more positively about them than brands that aren’t environmentally conciliatory; it makes me more likely to buy their stuff as I know they’re conscious producers. – F, 17
I think they are setting great examples and I would feel good about buying from a brand who is shown to be helping and caring – F, 20, Aspirant, VOD:Bingers
Some of this group like to reward brands for making a conscious effort to reduce their environmental impact, and feel very strongly about the topic.
It is a very important topic, and anybody who tries to help the environment should be rewarded greater than those who are not doing anything to combat the climate crisis – F, 20, Mainstream, Pop:Socials
I feel very strongly about sustainable businesses, and will buy from them because we need to encourage big businesses to reduce their carbon footprint further – F, 21
There was still a fair amount of criticism for brands that are publicly seen to be making a significant commitment and yet are merely jumping on the bandwagon to raise their brand’s profile and ultimately drive profits.
I don’t trust big brands 100% even if they’re saying they’re environmentally conscious there’s a lot of loopholes they could be using, so I’m always sceptical – F, 19, Alternative, Pop:Socials
In reality, there are very few businesses based on values that promote environmental-friendliness and sustainability. Most large companies have placed profits over the environment for decades and are only marketing themselves as environmentally conscious now as a result of changing consumer preferences and a growing public awareness of climate change. This makes it difficult to trust ‘environmentally conscious’ companies without knowing their full history.
The phrase ‘green-washing’ was mentioned by a few respondents who are cognisant of the fact that some brands are trying to prove they are environmentally friendly for all the wrong reasons.
I have mixed feelings. I think lots of brands are guilty of green washing. Lots of brands have jumped on the plastic free thing bc its trendy. Its often for the wrong reasons and they’re still encouraging consumerism.- F, 22, Leading Edge, VOD:Bingers
I never trust them completely as brands these days know it’s the ‘current’ thing to be environmentally friendly so they might be changing a few production habits in order to advertise that they’re doing it but really they’re still just as bad behind closed doors – F, 19, Alternative, Pop:Socials
There is a desire from young people for brands to prove that their environmental actions are genuine and not just a PR ploy – with one calling for more advertising on the topic.
I feel that brands need to advertise it a bit more so more people are aware about them being environmentally conscious and knowing the consequences of it.
Overall I have a positive opinion of these brands, if their environmental actions seem sincere/genuine and not just a PR ploy i.e. have a detailed, dedicated infrastructural plan on how they help the environment, in how they act to minimise their negative footprint – F, 21, Mainstream, Short:Snaps
Only 14% feel very satisfied with businesses’ efforts to care for the environment, and agree that they making a genuine effort.
“Brands are doing so much more for the environment in general. I am constantly seeing new methods and advertising to promote more eco friendly packaging and methods used by the big brands in every market” – F, 20, Aspirant, VOD:Bingers
Only 11% are satisfied with progress, but think there could be more visibility and communication of the environmental commitments businesses are engaged with.
“It seems that most brands/companies are trying now to care for the environment. Even if we can’t directly see what they are doing many of them are working ‘behind the scenes’” – F, 21, Mainstream, Pop:Socials
17% of young people feel strongly that businesses aren’t doing nearly enough, and are only making minimal, aesthetic changes for PR purposes.
“Most businesses don’t give a shit, they just do small amounts to appease the public by making their image look good. Some companies like H&M and Zara even use seriously misleading advertising to make it look like they’re being eco friendly when they’re honestly doing nothing” – M, 20, Urban, VOD:Bingers
A quarter of young people agree that there is much more to be done by businesses, and they need to focus on empowering consumers to make more eco-friendly choices.
“Businesses are more concerned with profit and power than they are with the environment. In the state out planet is now, there’s always more that can be done and there needs to be more consumer choice.” – F, 17
A third of young people sit in the middle – they agree businesses have made some progress, albeit slow, yet there is still a long road ahead.
“They are doing stuff of varying degree, but could be more proactive and innovative” F, 20, Aspirant, VOD:Bingers
“Fast fashion companies like Topshop and ASOS. So much plastic in their deliveries and free returns so lots of transport waste. Also tons of people throwing clothes away that get dumped in third world countries who end up burning then which releases tons of pollutants and harmful chemicals” – M, 20, Urban, VOD:Bingers
“I think H&M could make a bigger difference by donating to charities and becoming less of a ‘fast fashion’ brand, by having styles in stock for longer, rather than bringing out new items so often, as this encourages people to keep buying new clothes, which leads to waste.” – F, 23, Alternative, Short:Snaps
“Amazon is one of the biggest brands used all over the world by millions of customers, shipping out millions of parcels everyday, yet they still excessively overpack their products, using ridiculous amounts of cardboard and plastic packaging and paper for small tiny parcels.” F, 20, Aspirant, VOD:Bingers
“Coca-Cola are still using a large amount of plastic in their individual bottles of drink which aren’t made from recycled plastic. Also the packaging for the multipacks is a lot of waste material which could be cut down considerably. These issues are important because Coca-Cola is a huge company which sells millions of bottles per day and therefore is one of the main contributors to plastic waste” – F, 19, Mainstream, Pop:Socials
Amazon was mentioned frequently for their overuse of packaging and amount of next-day deliveries offered. Coca-Cola was also top of the list as a big polluter, with descriptions of beaches full of washed up bottles being mentioned frequently.
“A wave of car manufactures have finally decided to invest substantial amounts of money in producing electric cars over the next few years. This includes Volkswagen, Nissan and BMW to name a few. However these actions are offset by the fact that car manufactures continue to produce diesel vehicles that emit harmful nitrogen dioxide, PM10 and PM2.5 gases/chemicals.”
“LandRover – stop making these gas guzzling massive cars. Almost no one needs such a big car its excessive” M, 22, Aspirant, VOD:Bingers
Some young people have claimed to stop buying clothes entirely from fast fashion companies, whilst others have boycotted brands for various environmental reasons.
I’ve pretty much stopped buying from all the fast fashion companies entirely – M, 20, Urban, VOD:Bingers
I have boycotted Nutella for the use of palm oil in their product and will not buy until it has been changed for something environmentally friendly – F, 16
A few mentioned their involvement in environmental protests, particularly the recent Extinction Rebellion protests across the past few months.
I am part of Extinction Rebellion so I have done a couple of protests, some tree planting and an outreach stall. Additionally I would consider my plant based diet to be environmental action – F, 19, Aspirant, VOD:Bingers
Yes I have done protests before because I think the government need to implement radical environmental legislation. I also grow my own food – F, 22, Leading Edge, VOD:Bingers
Whilst some young people spoke about their involvement in environmental activism (e.g. protesting or boycotting brands), this is not representative of all young people. When asked whether they have ever taken environmental action, the majority of young people spoke about the personal effort they make in their day-to-day activities to care for the environment e.g. trying to limit their water usage and food wastage, recycling more, no longer buying single-use plastics or only buying reusable items, changing their diet to be more sustainable (e.g. vegetarianism/veganism) – rather than actively boycotting brands or attending protests.
“I have not actively taken part in anything outside of changing my day-to-day habits. I did go vegan a number of years ago, and one of my motivations for the change was the environmental impact. So, I think that that is the main way I care for the environment. And I try to be vegan also throughout life, so when buying clothes, cleaning products, creams etc.” – F, 20, Mainstream, Pop:Socials
One respondent spoke of a focus on reducing waste products (e.g. plastic, water, energy), whilst another couple recognised Channel 4 as one of the few channels to publicly make environmental commitments. A few others seemed to have more of an understanding of Channel 4’s ambition to fully switch to renewable energy sources.
“It is one of the few channels that generates environmental care campaigns that reduce the use of water and energy in their projects” F, 17
“Through social networks I heard that there are several initiatives, but the main one is to replace energy sources with something completely renewable as like hydroelectric and wind”
However, some responses were largely vague when it came to the details of Channel 4’s environmental commitments for the future.
“Reduction of waste” F, 19
“Something about the environment” F, 18, Aspirant, VOD:Bingers
It is clear there is a lack of awareness amongst young people of Channel 4’s environmental plight. This demonstrates there is a big opportunity to communicate these commitments more to a young audience who feel very strongly about big businesses/brands caring for the environment and who would most likely feel positively towards Channel 4 after learning about their new environmental initiatives.
Of Channel 4’s six main commitments, young people consider a pledge to use 100% renewable energy supplies from March 2020 as the most important in reducing C4’s environmental footprintOf Channel 4’s six main commitments, young people consider a pledge to use 100% renewable energy supplies from March 2020 as the most important in reducing C4’s environmental footprint
Of the young people we spoke to, Channel 4’s commitment to using 100% renewable energy supplies from March 2020 was ranked as the most important in comparison to the other environmental initiatives.
This group recognise the grave importance of reducing fossil fuel usage, given the central role it plays in driving the current climate crisis. For this reason, they regard a switch to renewables as having the most significant impact in reducing Channel 4’s environmental footprint.
For many young people, switching to renewables shows Channel 4’s desire to make a real impact, and acknowledge that the proposed deadline of March 2020 is hugely ambitious and therefore demonstrates a sense of urgency to prioritise environmental initiatives.
Channel 4 was frequently praised for recognising it’s influential position as a well-known broadcaster and using it’s platform to inspire change and lead the rest of the industry by example.
That’s a really good commitment to reducing the carbon footprint. It may even encourage others to follow suit – F, 24, Leading Edge, VOD:Bingers
Non-renewable energy is a big contributor to greenhouse gases which contribute to global warming which is a big issue for me. I think moves to change the approach is very positive – F, 19, Mainstream, Short:Snaps
Going full renewable is a big deal and sets an important precedent. Reducing landfill is also really really important and again should be talked about more. People don’t understand how important it is – M, 20, Urban, VOD:Bingers
With 52% of young people saying that the above commitment is ‘very important’ to them, it ranks as the least important environmental commitment overall to young people.
Whilst young people do consider the removal of single use, unrecyclable plastics to be important in minimising landfill wastage and damaging depositions of plastic in the ocean, they think that other environmental initiatives will have a more significant impact in reducing Channel 4’s environmental footprint.
Some were quick to pick up on the mention of only one location and ‘wherever possible’, responding that this initiative should be rolled out across multiple locations and should eliminate all unrecyclable plastics otherwise they question the amount of difference it will actually make. However, it was widely agreed that as a big business, Channel 4 has a responsibility to reduce the amount of plastic waste it produces, and it will make a positive environmental contribution, however small.
It says ‘where possible’ which to me isn’t very convincing that they will do much – F, 24, Mainstream, Short:Snaps
Single use plastics are a massive problem as it clogs up landfill and the oceans and damages a lot of wildlife and eco systems so anything a company can do to cut this down is commendable. – F, 21, Alternative, Solo:Selectives
Two-thirds of young people agreed that Channel 4’s pledge to use the Albert Calculator on all productions is ‘very important’ – ranking it as the second most important environmental initiative, behind the commitment to 100% renewable energy supplies by March 2020.
The majority of young people hadn’t heard of the Albert Consortium before, and were pleased to learn of it’s existence. They noted how important it was for all parts of the supply chain to reduce their impact on the environment, and praised Channel 4 for being a member of the initiative.
However, some were critical of the lack of information in terms of the action that Channel 4 would subsequently take. They maintained that whilst it is undoubtedly important to assess the carbon footprint of all productions, the pledge doesn’t include any concrete commitments in terms of what Channel 4 will do to reduce the environmental impact. This group recognise how important the Albert Calculator will be as a motivational tool to improve, however they question it’s effectiveness of significantly reducing Channel 4’s environmental footprint.
Good measure that incorporates this all, but it just gives information. How will channel 4 use this information and what actions could they follow as a result are more important. – F, 20, Urban, Pop:Socials
It focuses on all aspects of the chain, a lot of people might just focus on reducing waste or the footprint in one and forget about supply chains, transport, distribution etc. It sounds like a promising measure – M, 20, Urban, VOD:Bingers
Of the young people we spoke to, Channel 4’s commitment to educate all Channel 4 staff on sustainable practices was ranked as the 4th most important initiative with 59% agreeing it was ‘very important’ in reducing C4’s environmental footprint.
The majority of respondents recognised the importance of educating Channel 4’s staff and empowering them to understand their own environmental impact, and what actions they can take to improve it either inside or outside the workplace. Many commented that training of this nature can successfully create a culture where sustainability becomes part of every conversation, which can in turn inspire real change. In the words of Sir Francis Bacon, “knowledge is power”!
However, it was also frequently acknowledged that training doesn’t guarantee any concrete changes and therefore throws into question the genuine impact it will have in reducing C4’s environmental footprint. Many commented that the Albert training would need to be followed up with further strategies to encourage staff to engage with the sustainable practices they have learned, and ensure they remain committed to utilising their training.
Super good idea! Education on sustainability is so important because it means people will learn how to practice this at work and also hopefully think about sustainability in their personal lives and products as well. – F, 19, Aspirant, VOD:Bingers
Very important, education is the key for progress. – F, 19, Alternative, Pop:Socials
The majority praised Channel 4 for making such a serious and long-term commitment to environmental change. It was widely respected, and agreed that becoming a carbon neutral business is a major way to attempt to tackle the climate crisis and would have a hugely significant impact in reducing Channel 4’s environmental footprint. Many of this group hoped that it would inspire more big businesses to make the same commitment, and celebrated Channel 4 for taking responsibility in leading the industry to make more high-impact changes, and encourage other business to publish their own environmental plans. Therefore, successfully pushing the climate emergency to the top of the industry agenda
There was widespread recognition of how big an ask it is to become a carbon neutral business. Whilst many commented that it was positive goal to work towards, others were skeptical of how possible it will be to achieve in reality. Regardless, it was agreed that successfully publicizing Channel 4’s environment plan was hugely important, so it can set a precedent for other companies and ensure it doesn’t go under the radar.
Having 0 impact on the environment is a big ask, but it’s a very good goal to have – F, 19, Mainstream, Short:Snaps
This is extremely important because CO2 emissions are significant in fuelling climate change. By achieving net-zero emissions, Channel 4 is committing to a long-term future that helps to protect the environment- F, 19, Aspirant, VOD:Bingers
The majority of respondents praised the existence of a dedicated group responsible for overseeing the application of Channel 4’s environmental initiatives. They foresaw that the launch of 4Earth would instil a degree of accountability within the business for ensuring the commitments were honoured, and improve the chance of the necessary changes being made. It was widely recognised that Channel 4 would need company-wide support to deliver on their ambitious environmental commitments, therefore respondents hoped that 4Earth would aid such success.
Some young people mentioned the importance of 4Earth’s role in making noise and raising awareness – not only amongst staff, but also the general public. As demonstrated throughout this report, it is clear there is a desire from young people to see more publicity about Channel 4’s environmental commitments, particularly given only 12% had been aware of, or heard of, these initiatives prior to taking the survey.
Whilst it is undeniable that an internal group of Channel 4 ambassadors is important, others mentioned the valuable contribution that external individuals can make in helping Channel 4 formulate their environmental plan, and achieve the outlined targets – whether it being academics from the environmental sector, or other industry professionals with experience in the space. A partnership of this nature could also be seen to bring a degree of reputability to the 4Earth group, and Channel 4’s environmental commitments.
This will be somewhat helpful, but it is also important to recognise the role that people outside of the company can play in helping Channel 4 meet its targets. This could include industry professionals or academics from the environmental sector. – F, 19, Alternative, Pop:Socials
C4 have got big goals and they will need a team to support them, I think this is a good way in ensuring this happens. – F, 19, Mainstream, Short:Snaps
There is a sense amongst respondents that at this point in time any kind of environmental commitment from a big business is a step in the right direction. They spoke of the importance of Channel 4 using it’s platform to inspire real change throughout the industry, and praised the broadcaster for starting the conversation.
However, it was widely acknowledged that these environmental commitments should only act as the first step, albeit a very important one. There were suggestions that the next step should be to move beyond a focus on the internal business; namely, starting to use the array of platforms available to Channel 4 to promote public change, and use advertisements to encourage the adoption of sustainable practices by the general public. Given the scale and reach of Channel 4, it was widely agreed that C4 has the ability to have a much more wide-reaching impact and make real inroads to creating a sustainable future for everyone.
There was a clear desire from respondents for Channel 4 to communicate their progress in achieving the initial commitments, proving their genuine interest in the topic and in Channel 4’s plan to tackle the climate emergency.
These commitments are very promising and impressively detailed for such a large company. They really give the impression that Channel 4 cares about the world it films. – F, 18, Aspirant, VOD:Socials
For a first plan, this is an extremely good and impressive start. Only time will tell as to how successful it will be, but at present it seems realistic and achievable to use these measures to reduce the environmental footprint. Once these have been achieved, than Channel 4 can take even greater steps, but of course with serious changes to be successful they need to be done in small parts. Well done Channel 4! I hope you succeed! – F, 18, Alternative, Pop:Socials
We selected a small group of 4Youth members to write a letter to the CEO of a business of their choice, to help plan for the company’s new sustainability programme in 2020. In this letter we asked them to highlight what environmental issues their chosen company needs to focus on and explain why they are important.
To whom it may concern, I’m writing in regards to McDonald’s and their sustainability plan for 2020. I want to start this letter by congratulating McDonald’s on rolling out nationwide paper straws to replace plastic straws. Even though this is only the beginning this is simply the tip of the iceberg. For 2020 McDonald’s should begin to roll out recyclable materials that focus on paper based alternatives to plastic. For example, the toys in McDonald’s are still wrapped in unnecessary plastic as well as serving McFlurry’s with a plastic spoon and a lid. This would reduce plastic production and therefore reduce the amount of plastic used. The next point that McDonald’s need to address is the amount of electricity they’re using. At the moment McDonald’s could use greener forms of sourcing electricity such as solar panels, this would reduce majority the amount of electricity each store across the U.K. use. Furthermore, another step that McDonald’s need to take would be introducing a system in which promotes recycling to younger children. If the younger generation see this in stores then they would be more likely to carry this out at home. For example, on their Happy Meals put interesting facts about plastic and how they can recycle in store and at home. I hope these issues are highlighted at the next meeting regarding sustainability for 2020. Kind regards, Emily
I do acknowledge that you already implement several eco-friendly schemes, such as donating unsold clothes in Europe, using paper bags and including sustainable cotton in the clothing material. However, as a massive global company these attempts do little to improve your environmental footprint. For example, you are undoubtedly a company for fast fashion. Your clothing can survive being worn for several times, but soon after its quality decreases. This encourages your customers to go shopping again, in which you feed this demand by producing new styles weekly. In order to minimise the amount of your clothing which is then binned after a short while, please aim to create sturdier and more durable clothing. This is important to reduce the need for land-fill sites, ergo reduce pollution. The second thing is that despite your use of paper bags since 2002, this is not a sufficient replacement for plastic bags. Plus, your use of plastic from the products to the displays is still an enormous amount. Perhaps, instead you could recycle the plastic from your displays (which often change monthly) into more durable carrier bags. This is because your paper bags are easily damaged, especially when it rains and so are often binned; this ‘solution’ remains a problem. Therefore, please try to reduce your plastic use, in particular the single-use type, in order to dramatically reduced your negative impact on the environment as well as to help your customers be more eco-friendly. My third point is your electricity usage. I commend your efforts for using ships to move your products, rather than air-transport. However, the large amount of electricity you consume in your stores is certainly something you must tackle. Perhaps it could be as simple as using eco-friendly light bulbs (since your lights are switched on for long periods of time), solar panels, skylights or even use the pressure of your customers walking in and out of your store to generate electricity. service. These three points I have made are all vital in reducing your impact on the environment further The use of mirrors could also help keep your store bright (I do understand that the customers needs to be able to see the product!); essentially there are many options available for you to use in your store to reduce your carbon-footprint. If you bear these in mind, it could even increase the number of customers, because you will provide a more eco-friendly and will help you to prove to the world that Primark is indeed an eco-friendly and sustainable business. Best wishes for your future endeavours, A well-wisher.
The main things to focus on would be:
1)The reduction of electricity consumption in its infrastructure with the incorporation of renewable energy, whether it is the solar one that is the most commonly used
2)Influence the decrease in the use of plastics in the packaging of their products
3)Incentivize people to use ecological bags instead of plastic bags to store their purchases These three points are the main and important because something must be started and although it is not too much what they are doing in something they can include in the sustainability of the environment and the reduction of the environmental problems that our planet presents today
Tesco I would like to see a move towards eliminating plastic packaging in your fresh fruit and vegetable department. Replacing the disposable plastic bags you currently provide (which are exempt to the 5p carrier bag fee) with disposable and biodegradable paper bags and purchasable reusable cloth bags. For example string bags are widely used for carrying fruit and veg in some parts of the world. This vitally important to reducing and eventually eliminating the production of disposable plastic packaging, which his a huge contributor towards non biodegradable plastic waste.
I am writing to you about Amazon’s sustainability programme for next year. I think there are lots of areas where Amazon can make a difference which as well as being good for the planet, will make a big statement about the company, ultimately changing peoples perspectives for the better (increasing desirability and sales) and also help lead the way for other businesses and government changes. I think it would great if Amazon changed to using a completely renewable energy provider for all warehouses and offices. This would give the energy industry incentives to become more renewable and may cost you a little more (although I am sure you can negotiate) but will really impact the environment. Along similar lines I think something could be done about deliveries. This could be aiming to use an increasing number of electrical vehicles, getting to fully electric by 2024, or also doing more deliveries by bicycle especially in cities. The third thing to change is the packaging of parcels. This probably won’t help the environment as much as the other two, but it is the one that customers will notice the most and talk about creating a positive feeling towards your company.
Increasingly high energy consumption and continued use of fossil fuels they generated various environmental problems and are worrisome for the human development of the next decades. Access to water in minimum drinking conditions and its scarcity, they are increasingly alarming. Some scientists have been alerting for years about endangered species and successive loss of biodiversity, often caused by the invasion and illegal trafficking of animals. In addition, the global generation of garbage in cities will be twice that of the current one in 2025 and it is estimated that more than triple by 2100. This is indicated by a study by the journal Nature, which states that it is the fastest environmental pollutant to occur. If the waste is not properly treated on time, especially plastics, can cause irreparable damage in the environment and in humans. Recycling, in addition to alleviating this problem, avoid the use of new raw materials and thus reduce the environmental impact. This in general, for its part focusing on the problems even greater than the one generated due to the impact of the daily life of the human being, the animal supposedly the most rational being, is the one generated by the big oil companies as BP UK that in its oil spills that causes irreversible damage to the marine ecosystem killing millions of species, decreasing oxygen levels what causes the death of millions of fish and birds that look for food fill their oil plumage with their certain death In my opinion, these companies should improve their current spill detection systems. invest millions in technologies that like bacteria that degrade spilled oil faster in the same way have a team of specialists well equipped and prepared to immediately attack any natural event or caused by them.